Independent creator-tools review
vidIQ Review (2026): Features, Pricing & Alternatives
vidIQ layers research, idea discovery, channel analysis, AI-assisted creation, and in-context browser tools around YouTube, with a newer Instagram-oriented surface. This review separates its confirmed tools from the outcomes a creator still has to earn.
Quick verdict
vidIQ is worth considering when research and publishing need a shared workflow
vidIQ is best for an active YouTube creator who wants to turn topic research, competitor observation, packaging ideas, and channel data into a repeatable pre-publish routine. Its strongest case is breadth: keyword and trend context can sit beside channel-aware AI, an extension, ideas, optimization aids, and short-form repurposing. That is more useful than one isolated title generator.
The least suitable user is someone who expects a score, tag list, or AI draft to generate views automatically, or who mainly needs first-party analytics that YouTube Studio already supplies. The key caveat is interpretation: third-party estimates and AI recommendations are directional inputs, not a ranking guarantee. For creators willing to test ideas against audience response, vidIQ is worth considering; for a very tight budget or a simple one-channel dashboard, start free and compare YouTube Studio or Morningfame first.
- Best for
- Active YouTube creators who want research, planning, optimization, and channel guidance in one workflow.
- Not ideal for
- Creators seeking guaranteed growth, teams that chiefly need bulk administration, or people who will not use the findings.
- Free plan
- $0; 150 AI credits monthly plus limited core tools, checked November 2, 2026.
- Paid plans
- Boost: $19 monthly or $199 yearly. MAX: $49 monthly or $468 yearly, US one-channel list prices.
- Standout features
- YouTube keyword and competitor research, AI Coach, browser overlays, daily ideas, and clipping.
- Main drawback
- Feature gating and predictive-looking metrics can encourage false confidence without editorial judgment.
- Overall rating
- 4.1/5 for workflow breadth, accessible free entry, and useful context; score reduced for cost, learning curve, and limits of estimates.
What is vidIQ?
A creator-growth platform built primarily around YouTube decisions
vidIQ is a set of creator tools intended to help people research, plan, optimize, analyze, and improve video content. Its center of gravity is YouTube. A creator can use its web tools and browser extension to look for keyword demand, related topics, trending patterns, competitor activity, title and description ideas, and opportunities in an existing channel. The extension brings some of that context onto YouTube pages and into the Studio upload flow instead of leaving the creator to move among separate tabs.
The product now also promotes Instagram support through the same account and extension. The currently described Instagram tools focus on Reel ideas, public-Reel analysis, hooks, captions, and hashtags. That is useful cross-platform context, but it does not turn vidIQ into a complete social-media management suite with an all-purpose publishing calendar. Its clearest purpose remains helping video creators decide what to make, how to package it, and what to inspect after publishing.
It is important not to confuse metadata optimization with a growth switch. Keywords and descriptions can make a subject easier to understand and discover, but performance also depends on audience fit, a thumbnail and title that set honest expectations, click-through rate, retention, satisfaction signals, creative quality, consistency, and the competitive moment. vidIQ can frame those questions; it cannot supply the original insight or the viewer satisfaction that makes a video endure.
How vidIQ works in practice
Use it as a decision loop rather than an optimization checklist
A realistic workflow starts with an idea, not a finished upload. A science channel, for example, may type a broad topic such as “solar eclipse camera settings” into keyword research. vidIQ presents estimated search volume, competition, related queries, and its own directional score. Those signals help the creator compare several angles, but the creator still has to ask whether the topic matches their audience, authority, equipment, and ability to make a clearer video than current results.
- Find an opening. Explore a topic, trend, Daily Idea, or competitor’s visible breakout video. Automation helps surface possibilities; choosing a relevant audience promise is human judgment.
- Investigate the context. Review related terms, public competitors, their recent titles and thumbnails, and views-per-hour signals. Treat volume and public metrics as estimates or observations, not private platform data.
- Build the package. Use the extension or AI tools to draft a title, description, tags, hook, script outline, or thumbnail concept. Edit for accuracy, voice, and a promise the video can keep.
- Publish deliberately. The upload workflow can flag optimization gaps and suggest a posting time. The creator remains responsible for rights, disclosures, upload settings, accessibility, and the final metadata.
- Learn from results. Review the channel audit and YouTube Studio, then use the next idea cycle to improve the next video. Diagnose patterns across several uploads rather than treating one early result as a verdict.
That division of labor is the sensible way to use an AI-assisted platform. vidIQ can speed up a blank-page moment and expose patterns that a busy creator might miss. It cannot reliably determine why an individual audience clicked, stayed, or left. Use it to formulate tests, then let the creator’s own Studio data, comments, production judgment, and consistent experiments decide what is worth repeating.
Key features reviewed
The strongest tools are connected, but not interchangeable
Keyword research and search context
vidIQ’s research surface provides estimated YouTube search volume, competition, related queries, and a directional performance score. It matters most for tutorials, explainers, and evergreen searches where wording affects discoverability. A how-to channel might compare “fix a dripping faucet” with a more specific repair phrase, then make the video that best matches its competence. The limitation is built into the product’s own guidance: estimates change and cannot predict an individual ranking or view total.
Daily Ideas, trends, and public competitor analysis
Daily Ideas and competitor tools can surface topic patterns, recent high-performing videos, views-per-hour movement, and growth periods. This benefits creators who need a structured weekly research habit rather than endless feeds. A gaming channel could save three recurring formats seen in its niche, then create a differentiated version. It is less useful if copied literally: public momentum is not proof that the same format suits a different audience or can be produced ethically and well.
Browser extension and upload context
The extension overlays YouTube with video statistics, SEO-oriented scores, keyword inspection, competitor context, and upload suggestions; vidIQ also says it supports Chrome, Firefox, and Edge. In practice, it is helpful when a creator wants to research a video without transcribing details into a spreadsheet. The trade-off is cognitive load. A beginner can mistake a colored score for a priority, so start with one use case—such as checking related queries—before enabling every panel.
AI Coach, audit, and writing tools
AI Coach is positioned as channel-aware assistance for audits, content planning, titles, and next steps. The wider toolset can draft scripts, descriptions, hooks, and ideas. This helps a solo creator turn a rough topic into an editable first draft, particularly when they know what question they want answered. Current help text says channel-aware analysis has a data delay and works best with recent uploads. AI output also needs fact checking, a distinctive voice, and a clear separation between a suggestion and a diagnosis.
Thumbnails and short-form repurposing
vidIQ’s thumbnail maker accepts a prompt, video, or URL and supports prompt-based refinements before a 1280×720 export. Its clipping tool can select, crop, and caption segments for Shorts, TikTok, and Reels. These are practical time-savers for a creator repurposing a long interview, but they remain drafts. Review faces, subtitles, pacing, context, music rights, and the opening seconds before publishing. Use YouTube Studio’s own title and thumbnail testing where it is available rather than assuming every thumbnail tool runs live A/B tests.
Instagram-oriented creator tools
The newer Instagram surface supplies niche-based Reel concepts, a public-Reel analyzer, hook and engagement-oriented scores, and caption/hashtag assistance. It will appeal to creators who want one research vocabulary for YouTube and Reels. Its limits are practical: Instagram results have different audience behavior, content formats, and data visibility than YouTube. Do not transpose a YouTube keyword signal directly into an Instagram strategy, and validate any recommendation against your own account’s performance.
User experience and ease of use
Approachable first steps, then a real risk of dashboard overload
A brand-new creator can get value without understanding every feature. Connecting a channel, choosing a topic, reviewing related queries, and using a draft title as a starting point are manageable tasks. The extension’s in-page placement makes the tools feel close to the work. The free plan is also a low-friction way to see whether a creator actually returns to the research process rather than paying for an optimistic future routine.
Intermediate creators are the clearest audience. Once a channel has enough uploads to compare, Daily Ideas, competitor tracking, the audit, and AI Coach can help turn scattered observations into a regular content meeting with oneself. The interface is broad enough that a creator should decide what success looks like first: more searchable evergreen topics, better packages, improved retention, or a faster repurposing workflow. Otherwise, the quantity of scores, predictions, and prompts can distract from making videos.
vidIQ’s public materials describe Enterprise for brands, agencies, and MCNs with roles, permissions, multi-channel access, cross-channel reporting, onboarding, and optional strategy support. That makes the product more plausible for a team than a collection of personal creator tools. However, custom enterprise pricing and workflows should be evaluated in a demo, particularly where data access, account ownership, reporting needs, and approval processes are important. Self-serve resources and AI guidance are not the same as paid human coaching or a managed strategy service.
Independent signals should be read in proportion. When checked, the Chrome Web Store showed a 4.8/5 listing rating from 11.4K ratings, while TrustRadius showed only four reviews and summarized both positive research feedback and some renewal complaints. These are useful directional signals about extension adoption and reported experience, not a representative measure of every plan, support case, or creator outcome.
Pricing and value for money
Start free; pay only when a repeated workflow hits a real limit
The table reflects vidIQ’s official pricing page checked on November 2, 2026. Prices are US one-channel list prices. vidIQ says local pricing may vary and final pricing appears at checkout, so this table is a dated buying guide rather than a quote. Annual figures below are billed in advance, renew automatically, and work out to the shown monthly equivalent.
| Plan | Price checked | Key included capacity | Best fit | Important limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 150 AI credits each month; niche trends, data-backed ideas, AI Coach growth tips, and vidIQ MCP are listed. | New or budget-conscious creators testing whether the workflow changes their decisions. | Core access is limited, and the official page does not make it a substitute for every premium research or AI allowance. |
| Boost | $19 month-to-month, or $199/year ($16.58/month equivalent) | 2,000 AI credits monthly; unlimited trend research; optimization, subscriber insights, AI Coach deep thinking, thumbnail tools, ideas, and masterclasses. | Consistent solo creators who research and package several uploads each month. | One-channel US list pricing; usage consumes credits, and local checkout pricing can differ. |
| Boost + Coaching | Ask vidIQ for current pricing | The official plan FAQ describes full Boost access plus one-to-one YouTube coaching with a chosen coach. | Creators who specifically need human feedback on titles, hooks, pacing, or a personalized growth plan. | It is not displayed as a standard self-serve price card, so scope and cost should be confirmed before purchase. |
| MAX | $49 month-to-month, or $468/year ($39/month equivalent) | 6,000 AI credits monthly; Boost features; higher AI Coach capacity, Max Mode, and up to 11 hours of short clipping and generations. | High-output creators or operators who will actually use higher AI and clipping capacity. | A sizable recurring cost if the extra AI and short-form hours are not used regularly. |
| Enterprise | Custom quote | Team roles and permissions, multi-channel controls, cross-channel reporting, onboarding, and priority support are listed. | Brands, agencies, MCNs, and teams managing multiple channels. | Requires a sales evaluation; feature scope, seats, access controls, and price are not a public self-serve comparison. |
For most people, Free is the correct first choice. It can reveal whether the keyword, idea, extension, and AI surfaces change the creator’s process before a subscription is involved. Boost begins to make sense when a creator publishes often enough that research time, AI credits, and deeper trend/insight access repeatedly become a constraint. Its value is saved research friction and better-structured experiments, not a promise of a return on the subscription.
MAX is conditional. It is easier to justify for a creator who routinely turns long videos into multiple vertical clips, runs substantial research, and uses channel-aware AI as an active planning tool. It is difficult to justify for someone who uploads intermittently or already pays for a separate editor and general-purpose AI tool. Agencies should compare Enterprise with a documented seat, access-control, reporting, and support requirement rather than extrapolating from one-channel pricing.
vidIQ’s Terms say paid subscriptions renew automatically each monthly or annual anniversary unless cancelled before renewal. Users can cancel in the service or contact support, and paid benefits remain through the paid period. The same Terms generally say fees are non-refundable, with stated and legal exceptions. The official plans page describes the $0 tier but does not list a separate paid trial; that free tier is the safer way to evaluate the product.
Decision summary
vidIQ pros and cons
Potential strengths
- Broad YouTube workflow spanning idea research, packaging assistance, audit tools, competitors, and in-context extension data.
- Free entry point gives creators a way to assess fit before committing to a subscription.
- Keyword tools expose estimated demand, competition, and related terms that can improve topic framing for search-led content.
- AI Coach and writing tools can accelerate a first draft using channel context rather than a completely blank general-AI prompt.
- Clipping and current Instagram tools give cross-platform creators additional ways to repurpose and study short-form content.
- Enterprise options add a more credible path for roles, multi-channel work, onboarding, and team reporting.
Potential limitations
- Search volume, scores, trend signals, and public competitor measures are directional and should not be mistaken for guaranteed performance.
- Paid value depends on credit use and repeated habits; unused AI or clipping capacity becomes an avoidable recurring cost.
- Feature breadth can make the extension and dashboard feel noisy for a novice who has not defined a question first.
- YouTube Studio remains the first-party reference for a creator’s own analytics, revenue, publishing controls, and current experiment availability.
- AI titles, scripts, captions, and clips require human editing for accuracy, originality, rights, audience fit, and brand voice.
- Terms allow automatic renewal and generally describe fees as non-refundable, so billing timing deserves attention.
vidIQ vs. competitors
Choose the tool that complements your actual bottleneck
vidIQ, TubeBuddy, Morningfame, and YouTube Studio overlap around research and performance questions, but they serve distinct roles. The practical comparison is not which badge predicts the most views. It is whether a creator needs third-party research and workflow help, a simpler learning framework, native analytics and publishing, or operational scale.
| Product | Best for | Core strengths | Key limitations | Free option or starting price checked November 2, 2026 | How it differs from vidIQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vidIQ | Active YouTube creators who want research, idea discovery, extension context, channel-aware AI, and an Instagram/Reels-adjacent layer. | Keyword/trend research, competitor views, AI Coach, daily ideas, writing tools, clipping, and browser integration. | Estimates and AI drafts need judgment; paid credit/feature gating; native analytics still belong in Studio. | Free; Boost $19/month or $199/year; MAX $49/month or $468/year; Enterprise custom. | Combines a broad research-and-AI workflow with new Instagram support in the same product surface. |
| TubeBuddy | Creators focused on in-YouTube SEO workflow, thumbnail/title experimentation, and bulk channel operations. | Keyword Explorer, SEO Studio, A/B testing, thumbnail tools, Next Video Ideas, analytics, and bulk processing. | Pricing varies by billing choice; advanced search and bulk tools are paid; it remains a third-party layer. | Free entry; paid Pro and Legend plus custom Enterprise. Verify live pricing at checkout. | TubeBuddy is especially differentiated by A/B testing and bulk-management emphasis, whereas vidIQ leans into channel-aware AI, daily ideas, and Instagram tools. |
| Morningfame | Newer YouTubers who prefer a simpler guided analytics and planning experience. | Rich channel analytics, keyword research, Niche Spy, and an invitation-only onboarding model. | Fewer broad production, extension, team, and cross-platform features; access requires an invitation. | First month free. Basic $4.90/month; Plus $12.90/month, USD including taxes. | Morningfame is narrower and more coaching-like; vidIQ offers a larger toolkit and more surfaces, with a correspondingly busier experience. |
| YouTube Studio | Every channel owner needing authoritative publishing controls and performance reporting. | First-party channel/video analytics, reach, engagement, audience, revenue for eligible creators, trends, uploads, comments, and native tests where available. | Does not aim to be a paid third-party keyword/competitor workflow or full AI research layer; some reports vary by device and data can be limited. | Included with YouTube. No separate platform charge. | Studio is the source of record for a creator’s own channel. vidIQ adds third-party research, competitive, ideation, and workflow context around it. |
vidIQ vs. TubeBuddy
TubeBuddy is vidIQ’s closest broad YouTube alternative because both bring research and optimization actions close to the YouTube workflow. Each has keyword-oriented tools, upload assistance, analytics, ideas, and a browser extension. The differentiator is where the tools put their emphasis. vidIQ’s current product direction foregrounds channel-aware AI Coach, Daily Ideas, trend exploration, clipping, and cross-platform Instagram tools. TubeBuddy’s current materials more prominently feature SEO Studio, thumbnail and title A/B testing, and bulk processing/editing tools. For a solo creator who struggles to choose a subject and convert it into a brief, vidIQ’s guided AI and idea surfaces may be more compelling. For an established channel with a back catalogue and a systematic optimization program, TubeBuddy’s experiment and bulk features may be the better operational fit.
Neither tool’s SEO score should decide the purchase. A search-led tutorial channel should try the keyword workflow it will use every week: compare terms, inspect intent, build an accurate title, publish, and review Studio results. An entertainment or trend-led creator may gain more from competitor patterns, outlier discovery, packaging experiments, and an original creative angle than from a long tag list. Price also matters: vidIQ’s published US list prices are clear in this review, but TubeBuddy’s fetched official page did not expose a stable dollar figure, so compare the current plan, annual terms, and feature caps at checkout before treating either as cheaper.
vidIQ vs. Morningfame
Morningfame is a useful corrective for creators who find large creator suites distracting. Its official positioning centers on smarter channel analytics, guided search optimization, and recommendations that put a channel beside similarly sized channels. The Basic plan’s intermittent full research access and lower $4.90 monthly price make it a sensible planning tool for a creator who needs a lightweight cadence. Plus provides full access to its analytics, keyword research, and Niche Spy tools for $12.90 monthly. It is invitation-only, with the first month free according to its pricing page.
vidIQ offers more breadth: extension overlays, a wider AI toolkit, daily idea and competitor surfaces, clipping, Enterprise, and Instagram tools. That can save tool switching for a working creator, but it also makes the learning curve steeper and costs more at paid levels. A newer creator who needs help understanding what worked on their own channel may prefer Morningfame’s simpler coaching style. A creator publishing across formats or building an ongoing research system will likely outgrow its narrower scope sooner and may benefit from vidIQ’s broader set of options.
vidIQ vs. YouTube Studio
YouTube Studio should not be treated as an optional alternative to the data a creator owns; it is the first-party source of record for that creator’s video performance, audience, revenue eligibility, publishing controls, and native reports. Studio’s Analytics areas cover overview, content, reach, engagement, audience, revenue for eligible partners, and trends. It can show metrics that a third-party score should never replace, including impressions, actual click-through rate, watch time, average view duration, and audience behavior. YouTube has also announced title and thumbnail testing for creators with advanced features, making native experiment availability another reason to check Studio first.
The sensible combination for most creators is Studio for ground truth and vidIQ, TubeBuddy, or Morningfame only where a third-party tool supplies a useful research, planning, comparative, or operational layer. Budget-conscious users should begin with Studio and vidIQ Free. Search-led educational channels may add vidIQ or TubeBuddy after proving a recurring research use case. Entertainment, gaming, commentary, and Shorts creators should prioritize creative differentiation, packaging, and retention patterns over apparent keyword precision. Data-oriented operators may value vidIQ’s broader workflow or TubeBuddy’s bulk tooling; agencies should compare Enterprise controls. There is no reason to pay for overlapping tools if the free native reports already answer the next decision.
Is vidIQ safe and legitimate?
A recognizable extension and established service, not a reason to skip permission review
vidIQ is a legitimate, established creator-tools product with a current official website, documented terms and privacy materials, and a Chrome Web Store listing. When checked, the Chrome listing identified the publisher as the owner of the listed website, reported a good record with no violation history, and disclosed handling of personally identifiable information, authentication information, and user activity. Those are useful verification signals; they are not a blanket security guarantee or a substitute for reading current permissions.
Connecting a third-party creator tool means considering what account data it can access, why that access is needed, and how to revoke it. vidIQ’s privacy policy says its use and transfer of information from Google APIs follows Google’s API Services User Data Policy Limited Use requirements. It points users to Google Security settings to revoke YouTube API-authorized access and says it deletes such authorized data within 30 days after revocation or a deletion request, subject to aggregated/de-identified data and legal-retention exceptions. The same policy explicitly says no internet service can promise 100% security.
Before connecting a channel, review the requested Google and browser-extension permissions, the current privacy policy, the account’s connected-app settings, and the exact billing terms. Install browser extensions only from the official store listing. Check whether a shared channel needs a separate account, role, or approval process. Finally, note the auto-renewal and refund language before entering payment details. These habits are appropriate for any third-party analytics or AI tool, not a claim that vidIQ presents a unique risk.
Who should use vidIQ?
The best plan depends on channel stage, output, and willingness to act on the findings
New YouTube creators
Use Free to learn a simple research-to-publish loop. Do not buy a paid tier until a recurring limit is clear and you are reviewing Studio after every upload.
Established solo creators
Boost can be reasonable if competitor research, idea planning, upload optimization, and AI drafts support a consistent weekly workflow rather than occasional curiosity.
Search-focused educational channels
Keyword and related-query research can be especially useful for selecting precise, helpful tutorial angles. Match the phrase to a genuinely strong answer, not just a volume number.
Entertainment, gaming, and commentary
Use trend and competitor patterns for prompts, then prioritize freshness, personality, thumbnail/title honesty, and retention. Do not let SEO metrics flatten a creative format.
Shorts and cross-platform creators
Evaluate clipping and Instagram tools if repurposing is a real production bottleneck. Review each automated clip, caption, score, and hook against platform context before posting.
Agencies and brand teams
Ask about Enterprise only when multi-channel controls, roles, reporting, onboarding, and strategic support are documented needs. A demo should test the real approval and access workflow.
Creators on a tight budget
Start with YouTube Studio and vidIQ Free. Morningfame is a lower-cost focused comparison if you value guided analytics more than a broad tool suite.
Creators who should skip or pause
Pause before subscribing if you are not publishing consistently, do not have time to review results, or expect automation to replace a content point of view.
Final verdict
vidIQ is most valuable as a disciplined research partner, not a growth guarantee
Is vidIQ worth it? For an active YouTube creator who repeatedly researches subjects, studies public competitors, refines packaging, and reviews results, it can be worth considering. The platform’s appeal is not one magic feature. It is the way keyword context, daily ideas, in-browser research, channel-aware AI, writing assistance, clipping, and current Instagram tools can reduce the friction between a rough idea and a deliberate publishing plan. That breadth earns the 4.1/5 editorial score, alongside a usable free starting point and a clear path to team-oriented Enterprise options.
The trade-off is that vidIQ has enough scores, prompts, and paid capacity to create the illusion of certainty. Search estimates, trend signals, AI predictions, and competitor observations should direct questions, not settle them. The product is most likely to justify Boost or MAX when a creator has a real publishing cadence, knows which bottleneck needs solving, and will use YouTube Studio as the source of truth after posting. Beginners, intermittent uploaders, and budget-conscious users should begin free. In short: pay for vidIQ when it improves a repeatable content decision process, not because a tool promises to make content successful on its own.
Frequently asked questions
Practical answers before you sign up
Is vidIQ free?
Yes. On November 2, 2026, vidIQ listed a Free plan at $0 with 150 AI credits per month and limited access to core creator tools. Usage allowances and feature availability can change, so confirm the current plan page before relying on a specific limit.
Does vidIQ work for new YouTube channels?
It can help a new creator turn a vague topic into research questions, titles, and a repeatable publishing checklist. A channel with little recent data will receive less tailored analysis than an active channel, and the creator still needs to learn audience fit, packaging, and retention.
Is vidIQ better than TubeBuddy?
Neither is automatically better. vidIQ is a strong fit for creators who want channel-aware AI, idea discovery, competitor research, and current Instagram support. TubeBuddy is particularly compelling when A/B testing and bulk channel-management tools are central. Compare the live plan limits that match your workflow.
Can vidIQ guarantee more views or subscribers?
No. Keyword, trend, title, thumbnail, and analytics tools can support better decisions, but they cannot guarantee discovery, clicks, retention, satisfaction, subscribers, or revenue. Content quality and the audience response remain decisive.
Does vidIQ work with YouTube Studio?
Yes. vidIQ’s browser extension is designed to add research and optimization context while browsing YouTube and in the Studio upload flow. YouTube Studio remains the first-party source of record for a creator’s own analytics and publishing controls.
Is vidIQ useful for Shorts or Instagram?
vidIQ offers AI clipping for turning source videos into vertical clips for Shorts, TikTok, and Reels. Its current Instagram surface also offers Reel ideas, public-Reel analysis, caption support, and AI guidance. Treat automated clip and score suggestions as drafts to review before posting.
Can I cancel vidIQ easily?
vidIQ’s Terms say subscriptions can be cancelled within the service or by contacting support. Paid benefits continue through the current paid period, while subscriptions renew automatically unless cancelled before the renewal date. The Terms generally describe fees as non-refundable except where stated or required by law.
Sources and methodology
How this review was researched
This editorial review is based on official product, pricing, extension, policy, and competitor materials checked on November 2, 2026, with limited independent review context. It is not based on a paid vidIQ subscription, a hands-on channel test, an interview, or a performance experiment. Feature availability, prices, credit limits, reviews, support, and platform access can change, so confirm current details directly before subscribing or connecting an account.
Official vidIQ sources
- vidIQ Pricing & Plans; vidIQ Browser Extension; and Free YouTube Tools.
- Keyword Tools; Daily Ideas; Competitor Tools; and Channel Audit.
- AI Coach; AI Script Writer; Thumbnail Maker; and AI Shorts Clipping.
- vidIQ for Instagram; vidIQ Enterprise; Terms of Service; and Privacy Policy.